歌德作为创伤叙事的“世界文学”观

外国文学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 13-28.

• 中外学者对话“世界文学” • 上一篇下一篇

歌德作为创伤叙事的“世界文学”观

弗拉基米尔·比蒂

出版日期:2018-10-25 发布日期:2022-05-24
作者简介:弗拉基米尔·比蒂,奥地利维也纳大学讲席教授,《阿卡迪亚：国际文学文化学刊》主编,主要从事世界主义、创伤理论、文化批评、叙事理论等领域的研究。

Goethe’s Weltliteratur as a Trauma Narrative

Vladimir Biti

Online:2018-10-25 Published:2022-05-24
About author:Vladimir Biti is Distinguished Professor at University of Vienna, editor of <italic>Arcadia: International Journal of Literary Culture</italic>. His research interests include cosmopolitanism, trauma theory, culture criticism, and narrative theory. Email: vladimir.biti@univie.ac.at

摘要/Abstract

内容摘要： 比较文学界近来所推崇的“行星系”形态的文学在该学科过去二十年的发展中一直处于升温态势,并由此将歌德推至总工程师的位置。当下,部分学者忽略了歌德所处的时代与当今时代的重要差异,用歌德关于世界文学的思考来推断其特定的地缘政治。为了避免这种“伪装为全球主义的民族主义”,有必要讨论促使歌德提出世界文学“课题”的个人与集体的创伤因素。无论是作为一名作家还是作为一名德国人,歌德在当时都面临困境。这是他为什么在两种身份下都视跨越边界的结盟为处理困境的最佳方式的原因,我们也有必要详细探讨歌德的世界文学思想中诸如此类的个人与国家因素。

关键词: 世界文学, 世界主义, 民族主义, 创伤

Abstract: The recent comparatist celebration of literature in the shape of “planetary system,” which is on the rise in the last two decades of the discipline’s development, promoted Goethe to the status of its chief engineer. Disregarding important differences between Goethe’s and our age, recent interpreters placed his idea of world literature at the service of their particular geopolitical projections. In order to avoid such “nationalism masquerading as globalism” (Spivak), I will focus on both personal and collective traumatic constellations, which generated Goethe’s “project” of world literature. He felt stranded in his present as both a writer and German. This is why he, in both capacities, envisioned transborder alliances as the best method of coping with these frustrations. The paper investigates this personal and national investment in his idea of world literature in more detail.

Key words: world literature, cosmopolitanism, nationalism, trauma

弗拉基米尔·比蒂. 歌德作为创伤叙事的“世界文学”观[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(5): 13-28.

Vladimir Biti. Goethe’s Weltliteratur as a Trauma Narrative[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2018, 40(5): 13-28.

参考文献

[1] Albrecht, Andrea.Kosmopolitismus: Weltbürgerdiskurse in Literatur, Philosophie und Publizistik um 1800 (Cosmopolitanism: Worldwide Discourses in Literature, Philosophy and Journalism around 1800). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2005.
[2] Alexander, Jeffrey.Trauma: A Social Theory. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2012.
[3] Apter, Emily.“Literary World-Systems.” Teaching World Literature. Ed. David Damrosch. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2009. 44-60.
[4] Arendt, Hannah.Was ist Politik? Fragmente aus dem Nachlass (What is Politics? Fragments from the Estate). Ed. Ursula Ludz. Munich: Piper, 2010.
[5] Birus, Hendrik.“Goethes Idee der Weltliteratur: Eine historische Vergegenwärtigung” (“Goethe’s Idea of World Literature: A Historical Realization”) <http://www.goethezeitportal.de/fileadmin/PDF/db/wiss/goethe/birus_weltliteratur.pdf> Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1995. (accessed 5 August 2012.
[6] Bohnenkamp, Anne.“Rezeption der Rezeption: Goethes Entwurf einer Weltliteratur im Kontext seiner Zeitschrift ‘Über Kunst und Altertum’” (“Reception of the Reception:Goethe's Draft of a World Literature in the Context of His Journal ‘On Art and Antiquity’”). Spuren, Signaturen, Spiegelungen: Zur Goethe-Rezeption in Europa (Traces, Signatures, Reflections: On the Goethe Reception in Europe). Ed. Bernard Beutler and Anke Bosse. Köln and Weimar and Wien: Böhlau, 2000. 187-205.
[7] Cheng, Pheah.“The Cosmopolitical - Today.” Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation. Ed. Pheah Cheng and Bruce Robbins. Minneapolis and London: U of Minnesota P, 1998. 20-41.
[8] Curtius, Ernst Robert.“Goethe als Kritiker” (“Goethe as a Critic”). Kritische Essays zur europäischen Literatur (Critical Essays on European Literature). Bern: Francke, 1954. 31-56.
[9] Damrosch, David.What Is World Literature? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton UP, 2003.
[10] Goethe, Johann Wolfgang.Goethes Werke (Goethe’s Works). 50 vols. Edition commissioned by Archduchess Sophie von Sachsen. Weimar: Böhlau, 1887-1912.
[11] ---. Goethes Werke. 22 vols. Ed. Siegried Seidel. Berlin: Aufbau, 1965-1978.
[12] ---. Schriften zur Weltliteratur (Writings on World Literature). Ed. Horst Günther. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer, 1987.
[13] ---. Sämtliche Werke: Briefe, Tagebücher und Gespräche (Complete Works: Letters, Diaries and Conversations).40 vols. Ed. Friedmar Apel and Hendrik Birus et al. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp-Insel, 1986-1999.
[14] Günther, Hans.“‘Weltliteratur’ bei der Lektüre des Globe konzipiert” (“‘World Literature’ Designed While Reading the Globe”). Versuche, europäisch zu denken: Deutschland und Frankreich (Trying to Think European: Germany and France). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1990. 104-25.
[15] Herder, Johann Gottfried.Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit (Ideas for the Philosophy of Human History). Ed. Martin Bollacher. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1989.
[16] Koch, Manfred.Weimarer Weltbewohner: Zur Genese von Goethes Begriff “Weltliteratur” (Weimar's World Inhabitant: On the Genesis of Goethe's Term “World Literature”). Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2002.
[17] Mandelkow, Karl Robert.Goethe in Deutschland: Rezeptionsgeschichte eines Klassikers (Goethe in Germany: Reception History of a Classic). Vol. 1. Munich: Beck, 1980.
[18] Meyer-Kalkus, Reinhard. “World Literature Beyond Goethe.” Cultural Mobility: A Manifesto. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt et al. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 2010. 96-121.
[19] Moretti, Franco.“Conjectures on World Literature.”New Left Review 1(2000): 54-68.
[20] Novalis, Friedrich von Hardenberg. “Die Christenheit oder Europa” (“Christianity or Europe”). Schriften: Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs (Writings: The Works of Friedrich von Hardenberg). Ed. Paul Kluckhohn and Richard Samuel. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1983. 507-26.
[21] Pizer, John David.The Idea of World Literature: History and Pedagogical Practice. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State UP, 2006.
[22] Schlegel, August Wilhelm.Geschichte der romantischen Literatur, Kritische Schriften und Briefe (History of Romantic Literature, Critical Writings and Letters). Vol. 4. Ed. Edgar Lohner. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1965.
[23] Smith, Barbara Herrnstein.Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Oxford: Harvard UP, 1988.
[24] Spivak, Chakravorty Gayatri.Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia UP, 2003.
[25] Wiedemann, Conrad.“Deutsche Klassik und nationale Identität. Eine Revision der Sonderwegs-Frage” (“German Classic and National Identity. A revision of the Sonderweg question”). Klassik im Vergleich (Classics in Comparison). Ed. Wilhelm Voßkamp. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1993. 541-69.
[26] Wang Ning.“‘Weltliteratur’: From a Utopian Imagination to Diversified Forms of World Literatures.” Neohelicon 38.2(2011): 295-306.
[27] Wolff, Larry.Venice and the Slavs: The Discovery of Dalmatia in the Age of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001.

歌德作为创伤叙事的“世界文学”观

Goethe’s Weltliteratur as a Trauma Narrative

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蒋晖. 从“后殖民”到“后文明”——古尔纳《海边》中的世界主义[J]. 外国文学研究, 2022, 44(2): 30-45.
[2]	金英敏. 国家之外：叶芝与跨文化民族主义[J]. 外国文学研究, 2021, 43(6): 14-29.
[3]	钱林森, 阿尔诺·维维昂. 艾田蒲《中国之欧洲》：中法学者二人谈[J]. 外国文学研究, 2020, 42(4): 1-10.
[4]	张蔷. 论韦斯特法尔的空间隐喻与世界文学观——从《子午线的牢笼》谈起[J]. 外国文学研究, 2020, 42(2): 60-70.
[5]	陈礼珍, 大卫·达姆罗什. 再论中国文学与世界文学：大卫·达姆罗什访谈录[J]. 外国文学研究, 2020, 42(2): 1-12.
[6]	曾洪伟. 哈罗德·布鲁姆的“世界文学”观[J]. 外国文学研究, 2020, 42(1): 110-123.
[7]	郑丽, 卡洛尔·波伊斯·戴维斯. 跨越边界：卡洛尔·波伊斯·戴维斯访谈录[J]. 外国文学研究, 2019, 41(6): 1-15.
[8]	陈俊松, 马丁•普赫纳. 世界文学的机遇与挑战：马丁•普赫纳访谈录[J]. 外国文学研究, 2019, 41(5): 1-17.
[9]	周小川, 朱宾忠. 康拉德小说的英雄母题新探——以《吉姆爷》和《诺斯托罗莫》为中心[J]. 外国文学研究, 2019, 41(3): 117-128.
[10]	张秀丽. 创伤、遗忘与宽恕——论《威弗利》的记忆书写[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(5): 168-176.
[11]	王宁. 作为问题导向的世界文学概念[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(5): 39-47.
[12]	伊戈尔·沙伊塔诺夫. 作为挑战和伦理问题的世界文学[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(5): 29-38.
[13]	王璐. 走向跨学科研究与世界文学建构的文学伦理学批评——“第八届文学伦理学批评国际学术研讨会”综述[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(4): 171-176.
[14]	万晓蒙, 弗拉基米尔·比蒂. 后理论语境下的世界主义与创伤理论：弗拉基米尔·比蒂访谈录[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(4): 1-10.
[15]	宋宝梅. 论世界文学、流亡主题和世界主义：加林·提哈诺夫教授访谈录[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(2): 1-12.