古罗斯文学的品性

外国文学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 29-38.

• 中外学者对话俄罗斯文学研究 • 上一篇下一篇

古罗斯文学的品性

兰钦（田洪敏译）

出版日期:2017-12-25 发布日期:2022-06-15
作者简介:安德烈·兰钦,语文学博士,罗蒙诺索夫莫斯科国立大学语文系教授,主要学术兴趣是俄罗斯文学与新时期俄罗斯文学、俄罗斯文学和文化历史、文本的结构与互文性、中世纪俄罗斯文学（特别是圣传和编年史）诗学,以及约瑟夫·布罗茨基诗歌研究。译者简介：田洪敏,文学博士,上海师范大学比较文学与世界文学研究中心副教授,主要从事俄罗斯文学研究。
基金资助:
上海市高峰学科“中国语言文学”资助项目

The Peculiarity of the Old Russian Literature

Andrey Ranchin（Translator: Tian Hongmin）

Online:2017-12-25 Published:2022-06-15
About author:Andrey Ranchin, Ph.D. in Philology, professor of the Philological Faculty at Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow 119991, Russia). His main interests are Russian literature, history of Russian literature and culture, structure of text, intertextuality, poetics of Medieval Russian literature (especially hagiography and chronicles), and the poetry of Joseph Brodsky. Email: aranchin@mail.ru;Translator: Tian Hongmin, Ph.D. in Literature, is associate professor in the Research Center for Comparative Literature and World Literatures at Shanghai Normal University (Shanghai 200234, China), mainly engaged in the study of Russian literature. Email: tianhongmin@shnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Shanghai Gaofeng Project for University Academic Program Development-Chinese Language and Literature

摘要/Abstract

内容摘要： 古罗斯文学是一种特殊的现象,其特点是不注重美学功能以及作者的自我表达,不刻意美化个人写作风格、个人修养以求显示文风高雅,拒绝虚构与发笑。而且从严格意义上来说,在古罗斯文学中并不存在世俗文学体裁,古罗斯文学并非是一个囊括各类艺术体裁的体系。其特殊性还在于它是被作为一种同神有关的语言被了解,作者类似于“抄书吏”,其任务就是将东正教的意义阐明公开。而自19世纪中叶以来,持续复兴古罗斯文学传统可以作为一种俄罗斯文学精神价值来源不断在文学经典中加以阐释与生发,圣经教义成为其书写对象之一,这一现象的出现也同对古罗斯文学象征美学的持续认知相关。

关键词: 古罗斯文学, 文学的品性, 文学的连续性

Abstract: The old Russian literature is a special phenomenon. It is characterized by the neglect of autonomous aesthetic function, author's self-expression or deliberately cultivated author's style, and thus results in the rejection of fiction and of the comic effect. Practically there were no secular works in the strict sense of the word. The old Russian literature is not organized as a system of artistic genres. Its peculiarity lies in the tact that it is understood as a sacred language, and the main task of the writer. Who is very much like a scribe, is to explain the meanings of the Bible to the public. The revival of the traditions of the old Russian literature in Russia has been occurring since the middle of the 19th century. This process can be explained by the increased interest in the Bible as source of a spiritual values and is connected with awareness of the aesthetic significance of the symbolic language of old Russian literature.

Key words: the old Russian literature, the peculiarity of literature, the continuity of literature

兰钦. 古罗斯文学的品性[J]. 外国文学研究, 2017, 39(6): 29-38.

Andrey Ranchin. The Peculiarity of the Old Russian Literature[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2017, 39(6): 29-38.

参考文献

[1] Аверинцев, С. С. “Греческая «литература» и ближневосточная «словесность» (противостояние двух творческих принципов).” С. С. Аверинцев. Риторика и истоки европейской литературной традиции. М.: Школа «Языки русской культуры», 1996. 13-75.
[2] [Averintsev S. S.“Greek Literature and Middle Eastern Letters (Opposition of Two Creative Principles).” S. S. Averintsev. Rhetoric and the Origins of the European Literary Tradition. Moscow: School of Languages of Russian Culture Press, 1996. 13-75.]
[3] Гродецкая, А. Г. Ответы предания: жития святых в духовном поиске Льва Толстого. СПб.: Наука, 2000.
[4] [Grodeckaya A. G.Answers of the Legend: the Lives of the Saints in the Spiritual Search of Leo Tolstoy. St. Petersburg: Science Press, 2000.]
[5] Лихачев, Д. С. “Поэтика литературы.” Художественно-эстетическая культура Древней Руси. XI—XVII века. М.: Научно-издательский центр «Ладомир», 1996. 57-94.
[6] [Likhachev D. S.“Poetics of Literature.” Artistic and Aesthetic Culture of Ancient Russia. XIth—XVIIth Centuries. Moscow: The Scientific and Publishing Center «Ladomir», 1996. 57-94.]
[7] Лотман, Ю. М. Избранные статьи: В 3 т. Т. 1. Таллин: Александра, 1992.
[8] [Lotman, Yu. M.Selected Articles: In 3 Volumes. Vol. 1. Tallinn: Alexandra Press, 1992.]
[9] Ранчин, А. М. Сказания о начале славянской письменности. М.: Наука, 1981.
[10] [Ranchin A. M.Legends about the Beginning of the Slavonic Script. Moscow: Science Press, 1981.]
[11] Успенский, Б. А. Избранные труды. Т. 1 Семиотика истории. Семиотика культуры. М.: Школа «Языки русской культуры», 1996.
[12] [Uspensky B. A.Selected Works. Vol. 1 Semiotics of History. Semiotics of Culture. Moscow: School of Languages of Russian Culture Press, 1996.]
[13] Яцимирский, А. И. “Послание Ивана Бегичева о видимом образе Божием..” Чтения в императорском обществе истории и древностей российских при Московском универститете. Кн. 2. Отд. 2. I-X. М.: Университетская типография, 1898. 1-13.
[14] [Yacimirsky A. I.“The Message of Ivan Begichev about the Visible Image of God..” Readings in the Society of Russian History and Antiquities. Book 2. Dep. 2. Moscow: University Printing, 1898. 1-13.]
[15] Живов, В. М. “Особенности рецепции византийской культуры в древней Руси.” В. М. Живов. Разыскания в области истории и предыстории русской культуры. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2002. 73-115.
[16] [Zhivov V. M.“Features of the Reception of Byzantine Culture in Ancient Rus’.” V. М. Zhivov. Researches in the Field of History and Prehistory of Russian Culture. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, 2002. 73-115.]

古罗斯文学的品性

The Peculiarity of the Old Russian Literature

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价