何为哀歌?何为爱?——论汉娜·阿伦特对里尔克《杜伊诺哀歌》的诠释

外国文学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 109-117.

何为哀歌?何为爱?——论汉娜·阿伦特对里尔克《杜伊诺哀歌》的诠释

陈芸

出版日期:2017-10-25 发布日期:2022-06-15
作者简介:陈芸,浙江外国语学院中国语言文学院讲师,主要研究德国文学与比较诗学。
基金资助:
浙江省社科规划一般项目“里尔克《杜伊诺哀歌》：爱欲的诗学”（16NDJC271YB）

Title: What is Elegy? What is Love?: A Study of Hannah Arendt's Commentary on Rilke's Duino Elegies

Chen Yun

Online:2017-10-25 Published:2022-06-15
About author:Chen Yun, is lecturer at the School of Liberal Arts, Zhejiang International Studies University (Hangzhou 310012,China), specializing in German literature and comparative literature. Email: chenyun424@hotmail.com
Supported by:
“Rainer Maria Rilke's Duino Elegies: Poetics of Love” (16NDJC271YB), sponsored by Zhejiang Social Sciences Projects

摘要/Abstract

内容摘要： 里尔克的《杜伊诺哀歌》常被视为有着丰富哲学背景的诗歌,受到许多思想家的关注。在《里尔克<杜伊诺哀歌>》一文中,汉娜·阿伦特的分析主要集中在宗教与爱上。她认为哀歌的本质是宗教的残余,哀歌是失丧本身。不仅如此,她还认为爱是人的本真存在,其中包括了背弃和超越的可能性。通过对阿伦特思想的审视,可以看出她独特的言说理路和方式,她高度赞扬里尔克的爱观,并将之视为爱的自我圣化,爱是超越的原则。

关键词: 汉娜·阿伦特, 里尔克的《杜伊诺哀歌》, 宗教与爱

Abstract: Rainer Maria Rilke's Duino Elegies has been long recognised as a profound philosophical poem, and scholars have made many comments on it. In Rilke's Duino Elegies (co-authored with Günter Stern), Hannah Arendt is mainly concerned about the issues related to religion and love. She argues that the essence of elegy is the religious residue and the expression of loss itself. Further more, Arendt focuses on how love not only serves as the human beings' authentic existence, but also displays abandonment and possibility of transcendence. An examination of Arendt's thought will disclose that she has pursued her own course in a unique manner. She highly praises the love view of Rilke, who treats love as sacralization of self as well as the principle of transcendence.

Key words: Hannah Arendt, Rainer Maria Rilke's Duino Elegies;, religion and love

陈芸. 何为哀歌?何为爱?——论汉娜·阿伦特对里尔克《杜伊诺哀歌》的诠释[J]. 外国文学研究, 2017, 39(5): 109-117.

Chen Yun. Title: What is Elegy? What is Love?: A Study of Hannah Arendt's Commentary on Rilke's Duino Elegies[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2017, 39(5): 109-117.

参考文献

[1] Arendt, Hannah and Günter Stern. “Rilke’s Duino Elegies.” Reflections on Literature and Culture. Ed. Susannah Young-ah Gottlieb. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2007. 1-23
[2] Engel, Manfred.Ulrich Fülleborn. Hrsg. Rainer Maria Rilke. Werke. Kommentierte Ausgabe in vier Bänden mit einem Supplementband. Bd. 2 Gedichte 1910 bis 1926. Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 2003.
[3] [Engel, Manfred and Ulrich Fülleborn, eds. Rainer Maria Rilke.Works. Edition in Four Volumes with Commentary and Supplementary Volume, Vol. 2 1910-1926, Frankfurt: Insel Press, 2003. ]
[4] Fülleborn, Ulrich Engel, Manfred. Hrsg Materialien zu Rainer Maria Rilke Duineser Elegien. Bd. 1: Selbstzeugnisse. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt, 1980.
[5] [Fülleborn, Ulrich and Engel. Manfred. Reference Material of Rilke’s Duino Elegies Vol1: Self-testimony. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1980.]
[6] 沃尔夫冈·霍尔贝恩德·海特尔斯特凡妮·罗森穆勒:《阿伦特手册》,王旭寇瑛译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015年.
[Heuer, Wolfgang Bernd Heiter,Stefanie,Rosenmüller. Arendt-Handbuch: Leben-Werk-Wirkung. Trans. Wang Xu and Kou Ying. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2015.]
[7] Leader, Jonathan Wolfe.Being Political and the Reconstitution of Public Discourse: Hannah Arendt on Experience, History and the Spectator. University of Southampton, 2010.
[8] 赖纳·马利亚·里尔克:《里尔克诗全集》(第三册),陈宁译.北京:商务印书馆,2016年.
[Rilke, Rainer Maria.The Complete Poems of Rainer Maria Rilke. Vol. 3. Trans. Chen Ning. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2016.]
[9] Tömmel, Tatjana Noemi.Wille und Passion: Der Liebesbegriff bei Heidegger und Arendt. Berlin: Suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft, 2008.
[10] Dürr, Volker.“Personal Identity and the Idea of the Novel: Hegel in Rilke.” Comparative Literature 39.2(1987): 97-114.
[11] 伊丽莎白·扬-布鲁姆:《爱这个世界——阿伦特传》,孙传钊译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2012年.
[Young Bruehl, Elisabeth. Hannah Arendt.For love of the World. Trans. Sun Chuanzhao. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Press, 2012.]
[12] 张弘:《<杜伊诺哀歌>及其他——关于里尔克的读解》,《外国文学评论》1(2000): 74-83.
[Zhang Hong.“Duino Elegies and Others: Commentary on Rilke.” Foreign Literature Review 1(2000): 74-83.]