外国文学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 43-53.

• 文学理论与批评 • 上一篇    下一篇

马克思主义文学批评中的人类学形态概观

王庆卫   

  • 出版日期:2017-08-25 发布日期:2022-06-15
  • 作者简介:王庆卫,文学博士,华中师范大学文学院副教授,湖北文学理论与批评研究中心研究员,主要从事中西方美学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“马克思主义文学批评的中国形态研究”【项目批号:11&ZD078】的阶段性成果

Anthropological Forms in Marx's Literary Criticism

Wang Qingwei   

  • Online:2017-08-25 Published:2022-06-15
  • About author:Wang Qingwei, Ph.D. in Literature, is associate professor at the School of Chinese Language and Literature, Central China Normal University (Wuhan 430079, China), mainly engaged in the study of Chinese and western Aesthetic. Email: 19995210@qq.com

内容摘要: 伊格尔顿概括了马克思主义文学批评的四种形态,并将“人类学批评”置于首位,称其为“雄心最大、影响最远”的一种。这一论断,为探讨马克思主义批评的形态类型的相关研究提供了重要参照。虽然人类学思想在马克思主义中的地位尚有争议,但当前有越来越多的学者关注二者的关系,把人类学思想看作马克思主义的重要来源。本文认为,承认二者的关联并不意味着主张马克思晚年有一个独立于唯物史观之外的“人类学阶段”,也不应把马克思的人类学思考笼统地称为“人类学转向”,而应当将其视为马克思主义社会研究的一部分,视为唯物史观在人类学领域的延伸和拓展;同时,我们也没有理由拒绝把马克思主义的相关研究置于人类学的视角之下进行审视。本文力图探究马克思主义理论中人类学思想的发生和嬗变过程,剖析其理论动机和功能特征,并以人类学学科的自身发展轨迹为参照,从方法、问题域和理论目的等角度呈现马克思主义人类学批评的理论概貌。

关键词: 人类学, 马克思主义文学批评, 批评形态, 文化批评

Abstract: Eagleton summed up the four forms of Marx's literary criticism, and put “Anthropological Criticism” in the first place. This view provides a basis for the study of the morphological types of Marx's criticism. Although the position of the anthropological concept in Marx's theory is controversial, more and more scholars pay attention to the relationship between them, which is regarded as an important source of Marx's theory. The author believes that the recognized relationship between them does not mean that in the late years of Marx's life there is a stage of anthropology independent of the historical materialism. At the same time, Marxist anthropology thinking should not be known as “the Anthropological Turn”. Instead, we should regard it as a part of Marxist social research. What's more, there is no reason to reject the study of Marx doctrine from the perspective of anthropology. This paper tries to explore the process of the occurrence and evolution of anthropological thought in Marxist theory, analyses the motivation and functional characteristics of the theory, and presents the theoretical connotation of Marxist anthropology criticism from the perspectives of method, the problem domain, and theoretical purpose in the light of anthropological development.

Key words: anthropology, marxist criticism, form of literary criticism, cultural criticism

Journal Integrated Operation and Management Platform with Network