“神圣的欺骗”——论克尔凯郭尔的作者伦理学

外国文学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 159-168.

“神圣的欺骗”——论克尔凯郭尔的作者伦理学

尚景建

出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-24
作者简介:尚景建,中国人民大学文学院博士后,主要从事西方文论和外国文学研究。
基金资助:
国家社科基金重点项目“卡夫卡与中国文学、文化关系之研究”（17AWW002）; 中国博士后科学基金第62批面上项目“克尔凯郭尔文学批评思想研究”

“The Godly Deception”: Kierkegaard’s Ethics of Authorship

Shang Jingjian

Online:2018-04-25 Published:2022-05-24
About author:Shang Jingjian, is Postdoctor at School of Liberal Arts, Renming University of China（Beijing 100872, China）, with his research focus on literary theory and western literature. Email: jingjian0408@163.comTitle: “The Godly Deception”: Kierkegaard's Ethics of Authorship
Supported by:
“A Study of the Correlation of Kafka and Chinese Literature and Culture” (17AWW002), sponsored by the National Social Science Fund; “Study on Kierkegaard's Literary Thoughts”, sponsored by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

摘要/Abstract

内容摘要： 克尔凯郭尔的“作者伦理学”重新思考了作者对读者的责任,他认为写作中应该使用“欺骗”策略隐藏作者真实意图,让读者阐释作品,并突出作品的独立性。他采用假名、间接沟通、反讽等方式制造阅读障碍,拉开作者与读者间的距离,这种写作方式体现了伦理学吊诡,作者通过“欺骗”教诲读者,而读者在对“欺骗”的反思中才能获得真理。他的作者伦理学旨在反对浪漫主义过度直白的情感表达和黑格尔理性的直接性,凸显读者的主体性和个体性。这种方法承袭苏格拉底“精神助产术”和耶稣布道的方式,对20世纪读者反映论和“作者死了”等观点影响巨大。

关键词: 作者伦理学, 克尔凯郭尔, 欺骗, 假名, 间接沟通

Abstract: Kierkegaard's ethics of authorship has redefined the author's responsibility to the reader. He believes that a strategy of deception should be employed to hide the author's real intention, leaving the readers to interpret the work, thus revealing the independent status of the work. He uses means like pseudonym, irony, indirect communication intentionally to distance the reader from the author, which establishes an ethical paradox that the author must enlighten the reader through deception, the reader can only get access to truth through introspection of this deception. Kierkegarrd's ethics of authorship contradicts the explicit emotional emission of Romanticism, the blunt expression of Hegel's philosophy of rationality, highlighting the reader's subjectivity, individuality. Kierkegarrd's theory can be traced back to the ways of Socrates' “spirituak maieutics”, Jesus' preaching, has a tremendous impact on the20th century literary theories like reader-response criticism.

Key words: ethics of authorship, Kierkegaard, deception, pseudonym, indirect communication

尚景建. “神圣的欺骗”——论克尔凯郭尔的作者伦理学[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(2): 159-168.

Shang Jingjian. “The Godly Deception”: Kierkegaard’s Ethics of Authorship[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2018, 40(2): 159-168.

参考文献

[1] 艾布拉姆斯:《镜与灯》,郦稚牛等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004年.
[Abrams M. H.The Mirror and the Lamp. Trans. Li Zhiniu et al. Beijing: Peking UP, 2004.]
[2] 罗兰·巴特:《罗兰·巴特随笔选》,怀宇译.天津:百花文艺出版社,2005年.
[Barthes, Roland.Selected Essays of Roland Barthes. Trans. Huai Yu. Tianjin: Baihua Literature and Art Publishing House, 2005.]
[3] Berthold, Daniel.The Ethics of Authorship. New York: Fordham UP, 2011.
[4] ---. “Kierkegaard's Seductions: The Ethics of Authorship.”Comparative Literature Issue 120(2005):1044-65.
[5] Carlisle, Clare.Kierkegaard: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Cromwell Press Ltd., 2006.
[6] Derrida, Jacques.The Gift of Death. Trans. David Wills. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.
[7] 哈贝马斯:《交往行为理论》,曹卫东译.上海:上海人民出版社,2004年.
[Habermas, Jürgen.The Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. Cao Weidong. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2004.]
[8] Hannay, Alastair.The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
[9] 克尔凯郭尔:《论反讽概念》,汤晨溪译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005年.
[Kierkegaard, Søren.The Concept of Irony. Trans. Tang Chenxi. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2005.]
[10] ---. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. Trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1992.
[11] ——:《克尔凯郭尔日记选》,晏可佳等译.上海:上海社会科学出版社,1996年.
[---. The Diary of Kierkegaard. Trans. Yan Kejiaet al. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press, 1996.]
[12] ---. Either/Or. Trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1987.
[13] ——:《恐惧与颤栗》,京不特译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2013年.
[---. Fear and Trembling. Trans. Jimbut. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2013.]
[14] ---. Journals and Papers. Ed. and trans. Howard Hong and Edna Hong. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1967.
[15] ---. Training in Christianity. Trans. Walter Lowrie. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1972.
[16] Lippitt, John.The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013.
[17] Lübcke, Poul.“Kierkegaard and Indirect Communication.”History of European Ideas12(1990): 31-40.
[18] Mackey, Louis.Kierkegaard: A Kind of Poet. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1971.
[19] 聂珍钊:《文学伦理学批评:基本理论与术语》,《外国文学研究》1(2010): 12—22.
[Nie Zhenzhao.“Ethical Literary Criticism: Its Fundaments and Terms.”Foreign Literature Studies 1(2010):12-22.]
[20] Pattison, George.Kierkegaard's Upbuilding Discourses. New York: Routledge, 2002.
[21] Perkins, Robert L.International Kierkegaard Commentary. Georgia: Mercer UP, 2010.
[22] Poole, Roger.Kierkegaard: The Indirect Communication. London: Virginia UP, 1993.
[23] Watkin, Julia.Historical Dictionary of Kierkegaard's Philosophy. New Jersey: Scarecrow Press, 2001.
[24] Watts, Michael.Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2003.