文学法律批评vs法律与文学

外国文学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 33-42.

• 中外学者对话：文学跨学科研究 • 上一篇下一篇

文学法律批评vs法律与文学

吴笛

出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-10-28
作者简介:吴笛,浙江越秀外国语学院教授,浙江大学人文学院教授,主要从事英美文学、俄罗斯文学和文学翻译研究。
基金资助:
浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目“哲学阐释学视阈下庞德翻译思想研究”（17NDJC089YB）

Title: “Legal Literary Criticism” vs “Law and Literature”

Wu Di

Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-10-28
About author:Wu Di is a professor at Zhejiang Yuexiu University (Shaoxing 312000, China) and the School of Humanities, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou 310058, China), specializing in English and American literature, Russian literature, and translation studies. Email: hzwudi@yahoo.com
Supported by:
“A Study of Pound's Translation Thought in the Perspective of Philosophical Hermeneutics” sponsored by the Social Science Fund of Zhejiang Province

摘要/Abstract

内容摘要： “文学法律批评”与“法律与文学”同属跨学科研究,但是有着不同的研究目的和研究范畴。前者属于文学跨学科研究,后者属于法律跨学科研究。风靡欧美的“法律与文学”学术运动主要产生于法学界,在法学研究中使用文学素材,其着眼点是借鉴文学要素的法律研究,所探讨的是法律方面的相关命题,多半属于法学研究的范畴;而“文学法律批评”是我国学者所使用的学术话语,属于文学研究的范畴,以文学为本体,所强调的是文学批评中法律视野的介入,即借鉴法律视野和恰当的研究方法来审视文学作品。尤其是审视文学作品中的法律事件、法律主题、作家的法学思想以及法律要素在文学作品的措辞、风格、结构等方面的体现,从而加深我们对作家及其作品的理解和认知。

关键词: 文学法律批评, “法律与文学”, 跨学科视野

Abstract: Both “legal literary criticism” and “law and literature” are interdisciplinary studies, but they have different purpose and scope. The former is an interdisciplinary study of literature, while the latter is an interdisciplinary study of law. The “law and literature” study, an academic movement prevailing in America and Europe, mainly has emerged in the legal field and used literary materials in legal research with an objective of drawing on literary elements to further the exploration of relevant legal issues, most of which come within the scope of legal studies. In contrast, “legal literary criticism”, the academic discourse used by Chinese scholars, belongs to the realm of literary studies. It is a study that addresses literature as subject with an objective of adopting certain legal perspective in literary criticism, i.e., drawing on the legal perspective and appropriate research methods in assessing literary works. In particular, we should examine the legal events, legal themes, legal thoughts of writers, and legal elements in the wording, style, and structure of literary works, so as to deepen our understanding and cognition of the writers and their works.

Key words: legal literary criticism, law and literature, interdisciplinary perspective

吴笛. 文学法律批评vs法律与文学[J]. 外国文学研究, 2021, 43(5): 33-42.

Wu Di. Title: “Legal Literary Criticism” vs “Law and Literature”[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2021, 43(5): 33-42.

参考文献

[1] Anker, Elizabeth and B. Meyler, editors. New Directions in Law and Literature. Oxford UP, 2017.
[2] 阿里斯托戴默:《法律与文学:从她走向永恒》,薛朝凤译,北京大学出版社,2017年.
[Aristodemou M.Law & Literature: Journeys from Her to Eternity. Translated by Xue Chaofeng, Peking UP, 2017.]
[3] 卡多佐:《演讲录:法律与文学》,董炯、彭冰译,中国法制出版社,2005年.
[Cardozo, Benjamin N.The Lectures & Law and Literature. Translated by Dong Jiong and Peng Bing, China Legal Publishing House, 2005.]
[4] Dolin, Kieran.A Critical Introduction to Law and Literature. Cambridge UP, 2007.
[5] Dunlop C. R.B. “Samuel Warren: A Victorian Law and Literature Practitioner.” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, vol. 12, no. 2, Autumn-Winter 2000, pp. 265-91.
[6] 靳克斯:《英国法》,张季忻译,中国政法大学出版社,2007年.
[Jenks E.A Digest of English Civil Law. Translated by Zhang Jixin, China Politics and Law UP, 2007.]
[7] 查士丁尼:《法学总论——法学阶梯》,张企泰译,商务印书馆,1989年.
[Justinianus, Flavius Anicius.General Theory of Jurisprudence-Ladder of Jurisprudence. Translated by Zhang Qitai, The Commercial Press, 1989.]
[8] Kornstein, Daniel J.“Fie upon Your Law!” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, vol. 5, no. 1, Spring 1993, pp. 35-56.
[9] LaCroix, Alison L, et al. Fatal Fictions: Crime and Investigation in Law and Literature. Oxford UP, 2017.
[10] 李红海:《英国普通法的诞生·译者序》,《英国普通法的诞生》,卡内冈著,李红海译,法律出版社,2017年.
[Li Honghai.“The Birth of English Common Law.” Translator's Preface. The Birth of English Common Law, by R. C. Caenegem, translated by Li Honghai, Law Press, 2017.]
[11] 聂珍钊:《文学伦理学批评导论》,北京大学出版社,2014年.
[Nie Zhenzhao.Introduction to Ethical Literary Criticism. Peking UP, 2014.]
[12] 波斯纳:《法律与文学》,李国庆译,中国政法大学出版社,2002年.
[Posner R. A.Law and Literature. Translated by Li Guoqing, China Politics and Law UP, 2002.]
[13] Shelley, Percy Bysshe.A Defence of Poetry. Shelley's Poetry and Prose, edited by Donald H. Reiman and Neil Fraistat, Norton, 2002.
[14] 沃德:《法律与文学——可能性及研究视角》,刘星、许慧芳译,中国政法大学出版社,2017年.
[Ward, Ian.Law and Literature: Possibilities and Perspectives. Translated by Liu Xing and Xu Huifang, China Politics and Law UP, 2017.]
[15] Weisberg, Richard H.“Wigmore and the Law and Literature Movement.” Law and Literature, vol. 21, no. 1, Spring 2009, pp. 129-45.
[16] White, James Boyd.The Legal Imagination. Abridged ed., The U of Chicago P, 1985.
[17] Wigmore, John. “A List of Legal Novels.” Illinois Law Review, vol. 2, no. 9, 1907-1908, pp. 574-93.
[18] Wishingrad, Jay.Legal Fictions: Short Stories About Lawyers and The Law. The Overlook Press, 1991.
[19] 吴笛:《作为跨学科研究方法的文学法律批评》,《外国文学理论与批评前沿问题三人谈》,聂珍钊、吴笛、陈永国著,《山东外语教学》,2018年第3期,第70—77页.
[Wu Di.“Legal Literary Criticism as an Interdisciplinary Research Approach.” “New Frontiers of Literary Theory and Literary Criticism,” by Nie Zhenzhao, et al, Shandong Foreign Language and Literature Teaching, no. 3, 2018, pp. 70-77.]
[20] ——:《论拉吉舍夫作品中的法律书写》,《俄罗斯文艺》,2019年第4期,第57—63页.
[---. “A Study of the Legal Narration of Alexander Radishev's Literary Works.” Russian Literature and Arts, no. 4, 2019, pp. 57-63.]
[21] 徐昕:《正义的想象:文学中的司法》,中国法制出版社,2009年.
[Xu Xin.The Imagination of Justice: Justice in Literature. China Legal Publishing House, 2009.]
[22] 杨海英:《莎剧《哈姆莱特》中的法律问题与法律意识》,《河南大学学报》(社会科学版),2021年第3期,第72—78页.
[Yang Haiying.“The Legal Issues and Legal Consciousness in William Shakespeare's Hamlet.” Journal of Henan University (Social Sciences), no. 3, 2021, pp. 72-78.]
[23] 张丽卿:《法律与文学》,元照出版公司,2010年.
[Zhang Liqing.Law and Literature. Yuanzhao Publishing Company, 2010.]

文学法律批评vs法律与文学

Title: “Legal Literary Criticism” vs “Law and Literature”

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价