科学选择与安徒生对丹麦民族浪漫主义的反思

外国文学研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 97-107.

科学选择与安徒生对丹麦民族浪漫主义的反思

柏灵

出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-24
作者简介:柏灵,华中农业大学外国语学院副教授,从事安徒生研究和儿童文学研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“文学伦理学批评：理论建构与批评实践”（13&ZD128）

Scientific Choice and Hans Christian Andersen's Reflection on Danish National Romanticism

Bai Ling

Online:2018-04-25 Published:2022-05-24
About author:Bai Ling is associate professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan 430070,China). Her research field is H. C. Andersen study and children's literature. Email: bolingiswode@126.com
Supported by:
“Ethical Literary Criticism: Theoretical Construction and Critical Practice Studies” (13&ZD128) sponsored by National Social Science Fund of China

摘要/Abstract

内容摘要： 本文聚焦安徒生中后期作品中的科技元素,分析作家诗学观念和创作实践的转变,研究转变背后作家的社会思考和伦理诉求。19世纪中期,安徒生改变了早期浪漫主义的创作理念,选择将科学引入文学创作之中,以促进文学想象和文学形式的创新。面对丹麦民族危机,安徒生反对民族浪漫主义以历史书写和文学体裁等级划分的策略重构丹麦文化身份和文化秩序。安徒生选择以科学推动文学创新,以指向未来的科幻想象和打破体裁界限的形式实验与民族浪漫主义争锋相对。在丹麦历史转折时期,科学入诗的选择背后是安徒生以科学促进社会变革、推动现代民族国家构建和发展的伦理诉求。

关键词: 安徒生, 民族浪漫主义, 科学选择, 伦理诉求

Abstract: This paper focuses on scientific and technological elements in H. C. Andersen's works from 1840s and tries to identify the aesthetic turn of Andersen's authorship from romanticism. From mid-19th century Andersen turns to science and technology to find new sources of literary imagination and to facilitate formal experiment. This aesthetic turn to science signifies Andersen's divergence from Danish national romanticism. Facing national crisis, Anderson disapproves of the national romantic's strategy to reconstruct Danish cultural identity and cultural order through historical writing and hierarchical classification of literary forms. Instead, Anderson chooses science to push forward literary reformation, and fights against national romanticism by scientific imagination targeted at the future and formal experiment to break down the genre boundary. The ethical drive behind Andersen's choice of science is his pursuit of social reform and modern nation construction through the development of science and technology.

Key words: H. C. Andersen, National Romanticism, choice of science, ethics appeal

柏灵. 科学选择与安徒生对丹麦民族浪漫主义的反思[J]. 外国文学研究, 2018, 40(2): 97-107.

Bai Ling. Scientific Choice and Hans Christian Andersen's Reflection on Danish National Romanticism[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2018, 40(2): 97-107.

参考文献

[1] 安徒生:《安徒生童话全集》, 叶君健译. 北京:中国城市出版社,2009年.
[Andersen H. C.The Complete Fairytales of Hans Christian Andersen. Trans. Ye Junjian. Beijing: China City Publishing House, 2009.]
[2] ---.“Gudfaders Billedbog.” H. C. Andersen Samlede Værker, Eventyr og Historier III. Ed. Klaus P. Mortense. Denmark:Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006.166-89.
[---. “Godfather's Picturebook.” H. C. Andersen Complete Works. Fairytale and Stories III. Ed. Klaus P. Mortense. Denmark:Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 166-89.]
[3] ---. “I Sverige. ” H. C. Andersen Samlede Værker. Rejseskildringer II. Ed. Klaus P. Mortensen. Denmark:Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 11-136.
[---. “In Sweden. ”H. C. Andersen Complete Works. Travelogue II. Ed. Klaus P. Mortensen. Denmark:Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 11-136.]
[4] ---. “En Digiters Bazar. ”H. C. Andersen samlede Værker. Rejseskildringer I. Ed. Klaus P. Mortensen. Denmark: Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 211-582.
[---. “A Poet's Bazaar. ”H. C. Andersen Complete Works. Travelogue I. Ed. Klaus P. Mortensen. Denmark:Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 211-582. ]
[5] ---.“Det Nye Aarhundredes Musa.” H. C. Andersen Samlede Værker, Eventyr og Historier II. Ed. Klaus P. Mortense. Denmark: Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 382-390.
[---. “The Muse of the New Century.” H. C. Andersen Complete Works. Fairytale and Stories II. Ed. Klaus P. Mortensen. Denmark: Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 382-90. ]
[6] ---. “At være eller ikke være.” H. C. Andersen, Samlede Vaerker, Romaner III. Ed. Klaus P. Mortense. Denmark:Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 11-187.
[---. “To Be or Not to Be.” H. C. Andersen Complete Works, Novels III. Ed. Klaus P. Mortense. Denmark:Trykt hos Narayana Press, 2006. 11-187. ]
[7] 勃兰兑斯:《十九世纪的文学潮流》第二卷,刘半农译,北京:人民文学出版社,1981年.
[Brandes, Georg.Literature Mainstream in the 19th Century. Vol. 2. Trans. Liu Bannong. Beijing: People's Literature Publishing House, 1981. ]
[8] Mylius, Johan de. “Our Time is the Time of the Fairy Tale: Hans Christian Andersen between Traditional Craft and Literary Modernism.”Marvels & Tales. 2(Oct. 2006):166-79.
[9] 聂珍钊:《文学伦理学批评导论》.北京:北京大学出版社,2014年.
[Nie Zhengzhao.Introduction to Ethical Literary Criticism. Beijing: Peking UP, 2014. ]
[10] Oxfeldt, Elizabeth.Nordic Orientalism, Paris and the Cosmopolitan Imagination 1800-1900. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2005.
[11] ---. Journeys from Scandinavia : Travelogues of Africa, Asia, and South America,1840—2000.Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P, 2010.
[12] Zerlang, Martin.“Orientalism and Modernity: Tivoli in Copenhagen.”Nineteenth-Century Context 20(1997):81-110.