纳博科夫与什克洛夫斯基诗学对话探微

外国文学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 140-149.

纳博科夫与什克洛夫斯基诗学对话探微

赵晓彬

出版日期:2017-02-25 发布日期:2022-06-15
作者简介:赵晓彬,文学博士,哈尔滨师范大学俄罗斯文化艺术研究中心主任、黑龙江大学俄罗斯语言文学与文化研究中心兼职研究员,研究方向为俄罗斯文学与文论。
基金资助:
本文系国家社科基金项目“形式主义诗学视野下的什克洛夫斯基散文创作研究”【项目批号：13BWW036】的阶段性成果

Poetic Dialogism between Nabokov and Shklovsky

Zhao Xiaobin

Online:2017-02-25 Published:2022-06-15
About author:Zhao Xiaobin, Ph.D in literature, is chief of Research Center for Russian Culture & Arts at Harbin Normal University (Harbin 150025, China) and adjunct fellowship at Research Center for Russian Language, Literature & Culture at Heilongjiang University (Harbin 150080, China). Her research interests include Russian literature and literary theory. Email: zhxb2000@163.com

摘要/Abstract

内容摘要： 纳博科夫和什克洛夫斯基同为1920年代柏林的俄侨作家和批评家。二人在侨居生活与文学活动上有着近似的命运和际遇,在具体创作与诗学探索上则构成潜在的诗学对话与交流,这在短篇小说“柏林向导”和自传体小说《动物园》有具体而微的呈现。这种诗学对话表明,在呼应什克洛夫斯基陌生化审美原则的同时,纳博科夫更多的是对形式主义诗学的继承性超越。

关键词: 纳博科夫, 什克洛夫斯基, 诗学对话, “柏林向导”, 《动物园》

Abstract: Both Nabokov and Shklovsky were Russian émigré writers and critics in Berlin in the 1920s. As to their sojourn abroad and literary activities, the two had much the same fate and fortune. From the perspectives of literary writing and poetic exploration, “A Guide to Berlin” and Zoo: or Letters Not about Love constitute hidden poetic dialogism which is embodied, in specific detail, in the two works. The dialogism suggests that Nabokov, to some extent, corresponded to Shklovsky's aesthetic principles of defamiliarization. However, it indicates more Nabokov's inheritance and transcendence of formalism poetics.

Key words: Nabokov, Shklovsky, poetic dialogism, “A Guide to Berlin”, Zoo: or Letters Not about Love

赵晓彬. 纳博科夫与什克洛夫斯基诗学对话探微[J]. 外国文学研究, 2017, 39(1): 140-149.

Zhao Xiaobin. Poetic Dialogism between Nabokov and Shklovsky[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2017, 39(1): 140-149.

参考文献

[1] Березин, В. С. Виктор Шкловский. М.: Молодая гврдия, 2014.
[2] [Berezin V. S.Victor Shklovsky. Moscow: Young Guard, 2014.]
[3] Бицилли, П. М. “Жизнь и литература.”Современные записки 51(1933): 273-87.
[4] [Bitchili P. M.“The Life and Literature.”Modern Note 51(1933): 273-87.]
[5] 伊利亚·爱伦堡:《爱伦堡回忆录》(中),冯江南秦顺新译.海口:海南出版社,1999年.
[Ehrenburg, Ilya.Memoirs of Ilya Ehrenburg. Vol. 2. Trans. Feng Jiangnan and Qin Shunxin. Haikou: Hainan Publishing House, 1999.]
[6] Гришакова, М. “Две заметки о Набокове.” Труды по русской и славянской филологии. Литературоведение. IV. Тарту: Тартускийуниверситет, 2001. 247-59.
[7] [Grishakova M.“Two Notes on Nabokov.” Works on Russian and Slavic Philology, Literature. IV. Tartu: Tartu UP, 2001. 247-59.]
[8] Lodge, David.The Novelist at the Crossroads. London: Cornell UP, 1971.
[9] 弗·纳博科夫:“柏林向导”,文导微译,《世界文学》5(2013): 93—98.
[Nabokov, Vladimir.“A Guide to Berlin.” Trans. Wen Daowei.World Literature 5(2013): 93-8.]
[10] ——:《文学讲稿》,申慧辉等译.上海:上海三联书店,2007年.
[---. Lectures on Literature. Trans. Shen Huihuiet al. Shanghai: Shanghai Joint Publishing Company, 2007.]
[11] ——:《微暗的火》,梅绍武译.长春:时代文艺出版社,1999年.
[---. Pale Fire. Trans. Mei Shaowu. Changchun: The Time Literature and Art Press, 1999.]
[12] ——:《固执己见》,潘小松译.长春:时代文艺出版社,1998年.
[---. Strong Opinions. Trans. Pan Xiaosong.Changchun: The Time Literature and Art Press, 1998.]
[13] Ронен, Омри. “Пути Шкловского в «Путеводителе по Берлину.” Звезда 4(1999): 164-72.
[14] [Ronen, Omri.“The Way Shklovsky inA Guide to Berlin.” Star 4(1999): 164-72.]
[15] Скаммелл, Майкл. “Переводя Набокова, или сотрудничество по переписке.”Иностранная литература 7(2000): 274-85.
[16] [Scammell, Michael.“Translating Nabokov, or Cooperation by Correspondence.”Foreign Literature 7(2000): 274-85.]
[17] 维·什克洛夫斯基:《散文理论》,刘宗次译.南昌:百花洲文艺出版社,1994年.
[Shklovsky, Victor.The Theory of Prose. Trans. Liu Zongci. Nanchang: Baihuazhou Literature and Art Press, 1994.]
[18] ——:《动物园·第三工厂》,赵晓彬郑艳红译.成都:四川人民出版社,2016年.
[---. Zoo: or Letters Not about Love. The Third Factory. Trans. Zhao Xiaobin and Zheng Yanhong. Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House, 2016.]
[19] Шраер, М. Д. Темы и вариации. СПб.: Академический проект, 2000.
[20] [Shrayer M. D.Themes and Variations. St. Petersburg: Academic Project, 2000.]
[21] Сорокина, В. В. Русский Берлин. М.: МГУ, 2003.
[22] [Sorokina V. V.Russian Berlin. Moscow: Moscow State UP, 2003.]
[23] Цетлин, М. О. “Русская книга: Ежемесячный критико-библиографический журнал.”Современные записки 4(1921): 398-400.
[24] [Tsetlin M. O.“Russian Book: A Monthly Critical and Bibliographical Journal.” Modern Note 4(1921): 398-400.]
[25] Тынянов, Ю. Н. “Литературное сегодня.” Поэтика. История литературы. Кино. М.: Наука, 1977. 150-66.
[26] [Tynyanov, Yu. N.“Literary Today.” Poetics. The History of Literature. Movie. Moscow: Science, 1977. 150-66.]
[27] Владимир Набоков: Pro et contra: В 2 т. Т.1. Под ред. Бориса Аверина и др. СПб.: Русский христианский гуманитарный институт, 1997.
[28] [Vladimir Nabokov. Pro et contra. Vol.1. Ed. Boris Averin et. al. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute, 1997.]
[29] 汪小玲:《纳博科夫小说艺术研究》.上海:上海外语教育出版社,2008年.
[Wang Xiaoling.Study of Nabokov’s Fictions. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2008.]
[30] Зверев, А. М. Владимир Набоков. М.: Молодая гвардия, 2001.
[31] [Zverev A. M.Vladimir Nabokov. Moscow: Young Guard Press, 2001.]