Signifying Theory: The Historical View of Literature Represented by Norton Anthology of African American Literature
Fang Hong
Online:2017-08-25
Published:2022-06-15
About author:Fang Hong is professor of English at the School of Foreign Studies, Nanjing University (Nanjing 210093, China). Her academic interests are ethnic literature, ecocriticism and women's writings in English. Email: fanghong@nju.edu.cn
Fang Hong. Signifying Theory: The Historical View of Literature Represented by Norton Anthology of African American Literature[J]. Foreign Literature Studies, 2017, 39(4): 116-124.
[1] 陈顺馨:《当代西方文艺理论走向与文学史观念的变迁》,《北京大学学报》1(1994): 64—71. [Chen Shunxin.“Directions of Contemporary Western Literary Theories and the Change of the Historical View of Literature.”Journal of Peking University 1(1994): 64-71.] [2] 程光炜:《知识、权力、文学史——关于中国现代文学史观的再思考》,《南京大学学报》1(2005): 132—137. [Cheng Guangwei.“Knowledge, Power and History of Literature: Rethinking the Historical View of Chinese Modern Literature.”Journal of Nanjing University 1(2005): 132-37. ] [3] Gates, Henry Louis.The Signifying Monkey. A Theory of Afro-American Literary Criticism. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. [4] 盖茨:《指意的猴子:一个非裔美国文学批评理论》,王元陆译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011年. [---. The Signifying Monkey. A Theory of Afro-American Literary Criticism. Trans. Wang Yuanlu. Beijing: Peking UP, 2011. ] [5] Gates, Henry Louis and Nelle McKay. Norton Anthology of African American Literature. New York: Norton, 1997. [6] Hill, Patricia Ligging.Call and Response: The Riverside Anthology of the African American Literary Tradition. Boston. Houghton Mifflin Company. 1998. [7] Kinnamon, Keneth. “Anthologies of African American Literature from1845 to 1994.” Callaloo 20.2(1997): 461-81. [8] Mason, Theodore.“The African American Anthology: Mapping the Territory, Taking the National Census, Building the Museum.” American Literary History 10.1(1998): 185-98. [9] 乔国强:《论文学史的叙事性》,《上海交通大学学报》(哲社版)4(2016): 17—25. [Qiao Guoqiang.“On the Narrativity of Literary History.”Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4(2016):17-25.] [10] 陶家俊:《后殖民》,《外国文学》2(2005): 59—61. [Tao Jiajun. “On Postcolonialsim.”Foreign Literature 2(2005): 59-61.] [11] 王晓路:《盖茨的文学考古学与批评理论的建构》,《外国文学》1(1995): 92—95. [Wang Xiaolu.“Gates’ Literary Archeology and Formation of Critical Theory.”Foreign Literatures 1(1995): 92-95.] [12] 王玉括:《非裔美国文学批评中的后结构主义之争》,《外国文学评论》3(2013): 195—206. [Wang Yukuo.“The Debate Over Post-Structuralism in African American Literary Critic Circle.”Foreign Literature Review 3(2013): 195-206.] [13] 温儒敏:《文学史观的建构与对话——围绕初期新文学的评价》,《北京大学学报》4(2000): 55—62. [Wen Rumin.“Historical View of Literature: Construction and Discourse.”Journal of Peking University 4(2000): 55-62.] [14] 吴雨平方汉文:《“新文学进化论”与世界文学史观——评美国“重构派”莫莱蒂教授的学说》,《文艺理论研究》5(2013): 27—34. [Wu Yuping and Fang Hanwen. “Deconstructionist Franco Moretti’s ‘New Theory of Literary Evolution’ and Historical View of World Literature.’’Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art 5(2013):27-34.] [15] Yoon, Seongho.“The Debate Revisited:(Dis)Placing the Ground of African American Literary Theory.” Foreign Literature Studies 4(2014): 107-19. [16] 朱小琳:《视角的重构:论盖茨的喻指理论》,《外国文学研究》5(2004): 141—147. [Zhu Xiaolin.“Reconstruction of Visual Angle in Literary Criticism: On Gates’ Theory of Signification.”Foreign Literature Studies 5(2004):141-47.]