外国文学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 51-61.

• 中外学者对话文学跨学科研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“安提戈涅”到“希涅”:精神分析伦理学对文学的“使用”

汪奕君   

  • 发布日期:2022-05-18
  • 作者简介:汪奕君,武汉大学文学院博士研究生,主要研究方向为比较文学与精神分析学说。

From “Antigone” to “Sygne”: The Use of Literature in the Ethics of Psychoanalysis

Wang Yijun   

  • Published:2022-05-18
  • About author:Wang Yijun is a PhD candidate at the School of Chinese Language and Literature, Wuhan University (Wuhan 430072, China). Her major research interests include comparative literature and psychoanalytic studies. Email: agneswang2020@outlook.com

内容摘要: 通过对索福克勒斯的“安提戈涅”和克洛岱尔的“希涅·库封丹”之伦理抉择的解读,拉康建立和丰富了精神分析伦理的现代维度,并强调新的伦理诉求:涉及欲望不让步。欲望之“美”代替道德之“善”,重新定义了主体的伦理之维。思考伦理即是思考主体,拉康伦理主张的阐发依托于对文学主体的“使用”,这种使用本身也许同时意味着阐释/遮蔽;理应重新回到文学文本来反思这一“使用”,探讨精神分析伦理学在破除善之神话后如何同文学共处,从而避免将主体建构为一种机械的欲望模型,再度回归人本身。

关键词: 《安提戈涅》, 《人质》, 精神分析伦理学, 拉康, 欲望

Abstract: Through analyzing Sophocles’ Antigone and Paul Claudel’s The Hostage, Lacan develops and enriches a new dimension of modern ethics, and he did so by replacing the moral “service of goods” with the “beauty of desire” and redefining the central concept of his psychoanalytic ethics. It should be noted that thinking about ethics is not much different from thinking about texts. Lacan’s interpretation of ethics depends on the use of literary texts (in this case, these two tragedies) which suggests a suspicious act of “reconstituting” or “concealing” of the nature of literature. It is therefore necessary to come back to the literary texts and reflect upon the use of them in order to explore how psychoanalytical ethics may coexist with literature after breaking up the mystery of goodness, avoid a conversion of the text into an inflexible desire-model, and return to humans once again.

Key words: Antigone, The Hostage, the ethics of psychoanalysis, Lacan, desire

Journal Integrated Operation and Management Platform with Network